Buyer's guide

Choose a platform whose answers you can defend

A working guide to choosing a market and competitive intelligence platform. What a platform has to be able to read, the 3 jobs every platform does, who has to sign off, and 8 criteria worked in order.

8 criteria, and the 3 gates that cannot be fixed after contract
4 functions, and what each one weights differently
A scorecard for every demo, and tests you run on your own sources
Cover of the Northern Light buyer's guide, Choose intelligence you can defend
Choose intelligence you can defend
PDF, 19 pages

Get the guide

We send the guide and occasional research updates. Unsubscribe anytime.

Why this matters now

Answers are getting faster and harder to trust

1 in 4
knowledge workers spend about a quarter of the workweek searching for information
9 in 10
executives involved with AI say it may not be possible to know if their AI output is accurate
26%
of executives say internal audits caught AI mistakes before they reached the board or external audiences
Atlassian, 2025 State of Teams, via UNLEASH. Juniper Networks and Wakefield Research, via CIO Dive. Workiva, 2026 Midyear Executive Benchmark Survey, via IT Brief UK.

What is inside

8 chapters, written to be worked through

01

What a platform has to be able to read

Which licensed databases, analyst firms and financial sources are included, which are billed separately, and what it takes to get a competitor transcript in every quarter without a person downloading it.

02

The 3 jobs, in order

Unify, enrich, activate. Each is only as good as the one before it, which is why a demo that dazzles on the third tells you little about the first.

03

The move nobody scheduled

Search answers the question you thought to ask. Why most inherited keyword digests stop being read, and what monitoring has to do instead.

04

8 criteria, 3 of them gates

Licensed content breadth and depth, behavior when coverage is thin, and governance and AI use rights are pass or fail. A platform that fails any of them is out regardless of its total.

A look inside

Pages from the guide

Inside page of the buyer's guideInside page of the buyer's guide

Questions the guide answers

Which criteria should decide a market and competitive intelligence platform evaluation?

3 of the 8 are gates rather than scores: licensed content breadth and depth, what the platform does when coverage is thin, and governance and AI use rights. A platform that fails any of them is out regardless of its total, because none can be fixed after contract. The remaining 5 are scored 1 to 5 and weighted by the function you support most.

What are the 3 jobs every platform does, and why does the order matter?

Unify, enrich, activate. Unify is one governed index across licensed, proprietary and internal content, with permissions that follow the content. Enrich is the search and retrieval beneath the AI, with a citation on every claim. Activate is delivery into the CRM, the digests and the assistants people already use. Each is only as good as the one before it, which is why a demo that dazzles on the third tells you little about the first.

Which tests can a vendor not prepare for?

Three. Ask what it takes to get a competitor earnings transcript into the platform every quarter, for every competitor: if the answer involves a person downloading and uploading it, you have found where the time goes. Give the platform a question you have already commissioned a study for, and compare the output to what you paid for. And pick a competitor move you found out about late, then ask the vendor to reconstruct what their platform would have done in that window, against your own sources.

What is this guide actually comparing platforms against?

For most teams the incumbent is not another vendor, it is manual assembly: a licensed database, a web search, a folder of prior research, a general AI tool, and somebody stitching them together under time pressure. The guide treats that as the baseline to beat, and the honest measure of a platform is how much of that person's week it gives back.

Who has to sign off, and when should each of them come in?

Four groups, each at the point where their question can still change the shortlist. The budget owner before the shortlist, on the workflow it replaces and what success looks like in year one. IT, security and AI governance at shortlist, on access, audit logging, retention and AI use rights. Procurement before final demos, on the pricing shape and what changes at renewal. The teams who will read the output, during demos, on how intelligence reaches the CRM, the field and the readers who will never hold a seat.

Where do the adjacent tools we already run fit?

The question is rarely whether to replace them, it is which one is the hub. Sales-enablement competitive tools distribute a position well but do not produce the research behind it. Enterprise search connects internal systems with no licensed external content. Data and analytics platforms handle structured data and no unstructured external content. General AI assistants sit outside the category: useful for exploration, unable to reach licensed research or prove where an answer came from.

Other editions

Written for your sector instead